Pest Control Forum
Pest Control Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?





 All Forums
 Pest Control Portal
 Barrettine - Online Marketplace
 Unfair Criticism of 2nd Gen Anticoagulants
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Iain
Moderator

United Kingdom
224 Posts

Posted - 16 Oct 2006 :  11:11:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Here is a very interesting article from America on how Pest Control Professionals (PMPs) are being blamed for 'wildlife incidents' when it is almost certainly down to misuse by amateurs. And it has some interesting facts and figures to back up the argument.

http://www.pestcontrolmag.com/pestcontrol/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=372215

Any comments?

blatta
Senior Member

United Kingdom
134 Posts

Posted - 16 Oct 2006 :  20:05:31  Show Profile  Visit blatta's Homepage  Reply with Quote
That is a very interesting article. Due to the unusually high use of Brodifacoum by amateurs the statistcs are able to show who the likely offenders are.
With this in mind, is there anyway of altering the formulations of the amatateur / agricultural / professional products so some traceable 'marker' could be present? This may then give a better indication as to who the main culprits are. I assume it would mean three different registrations though????
Go to Top of Page

Dusty
Senior Member

Australia
439 Posts

Posted - 16 Oct 2006 :  22:27:51  Show Profile  Visit Dusty's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Shouldnt be too difficult. Any of the blue/green or red colured baits tend to also colour the droppings so other colourings will probably also work. Production costs would likely prohibit any change.
A simpler way would be to just limit the quantities able to be sold to the public. Restrict the sale of commercial amounts to registered professionals and leave small, expensive packs for the general public.

Don't feed them, get Rid of them
Go to Top of Page

Bigbully
Junior Member

United Kingdom
39 Posts

Posted - 17 Oct 2006 :  08:52:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I asked a question about distinguishing between amateur and professional misuse at a seminar when data re the UK situation was presented. I was told that data was not available. To my mind for DEFRA (or their Wildlife Incident Reporting Scheme) to be able to categorise a situation as "misuse" surely they must know enough about it to be able to say which side of the amateur/professional fence was responsible for the misuse? Even if they were only able to find this out in a percentage of cases it would be useful information. If they don't know enough to be able to categorise as such it begs the question as to whether they know enough to say it is "misuse" or whether this is their default category for anything that they cannot pin down.
Go to Top of Page

Gamekeeper
Senior Member

United Kingdom
165 Posts

Posted - 17 Oct 2006 :  09:16:10  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hmm, and who among us hasn't gone into a domestic garden at some stage and found OPEN saucers etc laden with bait from the local shop accessible to any passing omnivore ?

Fid Def
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Pest Control Forum © Pest Control Portal. Always read the Label. Use Pesticides Safely. Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000